Month: April 2023

I have two things to say about Borderlands related to the character of Moxxi, and they have basically no connection to one another except that they’re about Moxxi, so this is the Moxxi post.

The first is that Mad Moxxi’s Underdome sucks. It’s an arena DLC for the game where you fight off waves of enemies with steadily rising buffs to their HP and damage and so on, with randomized modifiers on the match like a certain type of gun doing more damage or everyone moving faster or enemies having regenerating health. The DLC is dogged by two problems: First, that finding the enemies in the arena can be a huge chore, and second, you don’t get any rewards worth caring about from it. There is no XP gain in the arena, enemies do not drop any loot, and while completing rounds does drop new guns, it’s a rate of 1 new gun per round and they’re not skewed especially strongly towards being any good. They do seem to be a minimum of green quality, i.e. not total trash, but at one gun per round, this isn’t nearly enough to make it worth the time. Coupled with how frustrating it is to actually find enemies and get into the fray, and the whole DLC is basically a bust except for introducing the character of Moxxi – but she gets a separate intro in the General Knoxx DLC anyway.

In a completely different game in the series, the Pre-Sequel, we learn that Moxxi is a mechanical wiz who talks with a redneck accent when “out of character.” As portrayed in the first two games, Moxxi is a show presenter/host who presents herself in a heavily flirtatious way with a healthy dose of apocalypse-glamor. She’s also the mother of Scooter, whose primary schtick is being a mechanical wiz, and you’d think they could’ve just let Scooter have all the mechanical wiz parts of the plot. Sure, that would mean the Pre-Sequel would have a lot of Scooter and not much Moxxi, but so what? Scooter’s a perfectly good character. Sure, I like Moxxi better and I imagine that’s a common opinion (half the point of Moxxi’s character is that she’s charming and charismatic, whereas Scooter is an obliviously crass redneck), but just because I like Moxxi doesn’t mean I like it when she’s wrenched out of character to do Scooter’s job.

They also could’ve used Janey Springs, although Janey’s not a particularly good character. She’s a junk dealer who lives out on the moon frontier with the scavs, and any time she’s sticking to that, she’s good, but unfortunately the game really wants her to be a gay disaster and is absolutely 100% clueless as to how to write that character. Whenever it portrays her interacting with men, it trips over itself to deliver Feminist Messages(tm), but then Moxxi’s exhaustion with Janey’s flirting suggest that either Janey is a sex pest who won’t take no for an answer or else Moxxi is a cruel gossip who doesn’t clearly communicate her lack of interest to Janey but talks bluntly about how much she despises Janey behind her back, and to random adventurers that Moxxi only met five minutes ago, no less.

Although, having written that, I realize that half the problems with Janey’s character are because the story spotlights Moxxi at her expense, and if we’re minimizing Moxxi’s presence in the story (or even cutting her completely), then that problem disappears. Touch up the writing on some of the other quests (the basic premise of her connection with Deadlift is fine, the joke just doesn’t land) and she’d be way better at Moxxi’s job in this story than Moxxi is.

It kind of feels like the Pre-Sequel writers were trying to make Moxxi a more complex character by giving her more than just her show presenter style? But if so, it was a failure. When we see Moxxi “out of character,” she’s still putting on a show. It’s just a show of being a redneck mechanic, like Scooter does. The presentation is much lower effort, because the showrunner Mad Moxxi persona is all about glamor and spotlight, that’s the whole job, whereas the Scooter’s Mom persona is about being grounded and competent, something you’d put on to inspire enough confidence in your mechanical skills to convince people to pay you to fix their truck, and then relying on your ability to actually fix trucks to turn that into repeat business. Or, outside a business environment, just angling your presentation towards how you like to fix trucks because you are proud enough of your truck fixing skills that you would like to lead with that. The mechanic persona directs people’s attention to a specific skill you’d like people to notice you have, whereas the showrunner persona directs people’s attention to the vivacious and fun-loving nature of the persona itself. A mechanic’s presentation is not the key skill to their business, but they do still have to get their game face on before going to work.

If you wanted to present Moxxi out of character just to make the point that her public-facing persona requires effortand can’t be maintained 24/7 (and I’m not even sure that’s the point of this rather than just lazily slapping an excuse for Moxxi to participate in the Pre-Sequel’s plot where she doesn’t othewise have a role, but assuming the point of the scene is actually that Moxxi’s persona can’t be on all the time), you don’t want to have her putting on another, lower-effort but equally focused persona. You want to show her in a hoodie and pajama pants trying to untangle a snarled schedule for next week’s fights or counting up income and expenses to see if putting in some new slot machines is a good idea or just watching Space Netflix to unwind, depending on whether you want to focus on how the Mad Moxxi persona requires behind-the-scenes effort or on how Moxxi is a regular person (I mean, she’d still be a Borderlands character, but Mad Moxxi is an exaggerated character even by the series’ standard) who has regular breaks and weekends and stuff between her performances.

Either one would’ve made Moxxi a much more interesting character with a twenty-second glimpse of her in a different model and voice than we’re used to seeing her with, exactly like we got in the Pre-Sequel as it is, but instead Moxxi seems even more unreal and cartoonish because she has this second, completely unrelated persona and skill set.

The first Borderlands game had a pretty generic shooter plot and got a bunch of attention for reskinning itself into one of the first magenta games. It didn’t go full magenta untilt he sequel, and I like the light sprinkling better than the more concentrated doses later games had, especially the Pre-Sequel (and I’m slightly worried about how bad it’s going to be in 3, which I have not played yet). I’m not here to talk about line-by-line dialogue, though. This post is about the tangled plot of Borderlands 1 and how it could’ve been much smoother without really changing anything except a bit of expository dialogue.

Borderlands has two recurring problems in its plot. The first is that it doesn’t tell you the significance of what you’re doing until it’s already done, with characters like Angel (whose motives for helping you aren’t even explained or even hinted at in this game), Dr. Zed, Marcus, and Patricia telling you what to do and then explaining how it gets you closer to the end goal of finding the Vault after you’ve done it. The first and obvious rewrite, then, is to move an explanation for why you’re doing what you’re doing to up front.

And second, which is that you are always proceeding directly towards the Vault, which means the path to the Vault is ludicrously convoluted. And although the Vault is talked up as the central MacGuffin, it and its Eridian creators are barely in the game. You don’t encounter the Eridian aliens who built the thing very much until the very end, just outside the Vault, and when you do encounter them, it’s not any more significant than as a new enemy type. It’s an interesting new enemy type and I’m glad it’s in the game, but you do not spend the finale learning ancient Eridian secrets. You spend it fighting the Crimson Lance mercenaries. The only Eridian secret is that they actually built the Vault to contain some tentacle monster, not to hold treasure, and that tentacle monster stabs the only built-up villain of the entire game to death to yoink the final boss fight for itself.

The actual gameplay of Borderlands isn’t about Vault hunting at all. It’s about defeating bandit chieftains and later the Crimson Lance. So rather than bothering with all this Vault key fragment nonsense in the first place, maybe it’d be better off to cast the protagonists as bounty hunters and mercenaries. The Vault is Patricia Tannis’ obsession, and Commandant Steele’s (Commandant Steele being the commander of the Crimson Lance). The player’s got a list of bandit chiefs to take down and that’s their MacGuffin, only dragged into all this Vault business because everyone else cares about it.

Continue reading “Borderlands 1 Plot Workshop” →

I probably don’t need to introduce Borderlands, y’know, the looter shooter game. I’m giving the complete series a playthrough from 1 to 3, including the Pre-Sequel but not Tales, unless I decide that some number of these games are actually Regrets. I like gun roulette and I like shooters, so probably even some really awful writing isn’t going to bring me down to Regrets, but I haven’t tried Borderlands 3 yet and the overall trajectory of the series’ writing is to get steadily more magenta over time, so we’ll see if it manages to cross the Regrets threshold despite its gameplay.

But today I’m talking about enemy spawns. Using the very early part of Borderlands as an example, the starting town is Firestone, the first villain is a bandit captain named Nine-Toes, and one of the first quests is to go and clear out a bandit outpost just across the road from the gate into Firestone. Perfectly good little quest with one problem: The bandits respawn, so if you ever revisit that outpost for any reason, it’s inescapable that you didn’t actually accomplish anything. On the other hand, you don’t want all enemies to never respawn, because that both makes maps uncannily safe as soon as you’ve cleared them (because enemies never patrol or reoccupy cleared territory unless you want to write in an entire AI for trying to take and hold territory) and it means you can’t have the fun of returning to an area you’ve overleveled and obliterating the opposition (something the Borderlands series is already bad at, since it has a nasty habit of leveling enemies in old regions after breakpoints in the story – but doesn’t even do that consistently, so sometimes you get sent back to an old area that you’ve out-leveled by 5+ but sometimes you’ll find all the enemies just got juiced up to about your level).

If I were put in charge of a remaster/make/boot of the series, I’d give it four types of enemy spawns based on two toggles: Story flags and character level.

Some enemies would stop respawning after a certain story flag has been set. This is reserved mainly for named boss enemies, and the story flag is killing them. Once you kill Nine-Toes, he doesn’t come back. Some unnamed enemies also qualify, if the story makes a point that you’re clearing them out to get some tactical or strategic advantage. Those outpost bandits, for example, would stop respawning after the quest to clear the outpost is complete. The story made a point of clearing that outpost in particular to stop Nine-Toes from seeing everyone who goes in and out of Firestone through the gate, so it stays cleared. The story flag doesn’t have to be relevant to the main plot, necessarily. Zephyr Substation is a wind farm that the bandits have overrun which you visit while acquiring a key to a stronghold that holds a key to another stronghold, which is not amazing quest design, but the important thing for purposes of this post is that there is a side quest to get the wind farm operational again and the bandits occupying it should keep spawning until the side quest to reactivate the farm is completed, not the main quest to fetch a key from it.

Some enemies should stop respawning after you reach a certain level, regardless of what story flags are flipped. Borderlands is already one of those games that cuts the XP given by enemies based on the level difference, and about 5-10 levels over the enemies they stop giving XP entirely (there’s no hard cutoff, it just gets cut into a smaller and smaller fraction of the default until it rounds down to 0, so it can be 5 levels for one enemy and 15 for another, but 5-ish is about the point when enemies stop being relevant). They’ll keep respawning if you’re underleveled even if the local plot is complete and stop spawning when you reach a certain level even if the local plot is incomplete.

This category is for patrolling bad guys, like the bandits and alien wildlife you find moseying around the roads and trails connecting points of interest to one another. If they’re not worth XP, that suggests they’re also not worth the players time, so stop respawning them. These enemies are now so weak that the player can walk right past them while ignoring their bullets if they don’t want to go to the effort of mowing them down, so just don’t bother. Most areas have a level range, so when you’re right on the cusp of outleveling that area, it’ll despawn the lower end of the range as you outlevel it completely, but leave the upper end of the range, which is only 3-4 levels below you, which organically gives a sense of areas starting to thin out as you progress. It’s not directly tied to how many of them you’ve killed, but it’ll feel that way.

Some enemies stop respawning only if you reach a certain level and flip a relevant story flag. For example, some patrolling enemies I would normally give a purely level-based despawn are required for a kill-ten-rats kind of quest, and while that is also not amazing game design, you definitely don’t want to make it possible to softlock yourself out of it by overleveling until the patrols stop spawning. Also, the bandits in various bandit strongholds holding bosses like Nine-Toes and Sledge should keep respawning until you have outleveled them by 5+ and you’ve defeated the relevant boss. If you show up to the boss dungeon ridiculously overleveled, you still have to fight the whole dungeon for pacing reasons, and if you defeat the boss at a normal level (or while underleveled) you can still revisit the dungeon for level grinding purposes and/or for funsies for as long as the enemies there are powerful enough to be remotely relevant. Only after the dungeon has served its purpose in the main plot and ceased to be remotely meaningful opposition does the general bandit population stop spawning.

Finally, you want a handful of stray enemies who keep respawning no matter how overleveled you get or how far into the story you get. The bandit strongholds, for example, might have one or two rooms that remain fully stocked with bandits no matter how powerful you get, and while some of the absurdly hostile wildlife moseying about the map might stop spawning when you get too high level, others might continue to suicide rush you when they see you walking or driving down the road. This allows a player to do the whole “obliterate some low level enemies to see how far you’ve come” thing without obligating them to do so whenever driving around lower level areas (especially since both the first and second game have a few quests encouraging you to return to much earlier areas of the game).

In a previous post I talked about how Far Cry 4 is two really good games combined into a single just okay game. Here I’m going to elaborate a bit on how it could’ve been really good at just the one thing by editing the story a bit.

The game opens the same way and can retain the “wait for Pagan Min to get back” ending. If you don’t take that, you flee the palace with the Golden Path and end up in southern Kyrat. Your goals now are to inter the ashes of your mother at the shrine with Lakshmana, honoring her last wish, to kill Pagan Min and his lieutenants, honoring the last wish of your father as relayed to you by the Golden Path, and to get out of Kyrat alive. You can get intel on Pagan Min’s three lieutenants (Noore, de Pleur, and Yuma, all good enough characters to retain even if none of them are particularly spectacular) by completing side quests: Outpost raids, assassinations (including for the one CIA guy), destroying propaganda, hunting, you can even do the drug thing if you can find some excuse why Yogi and Reggie have dirt on Pagan’s lieutenants (and they do have some kind of connection to Noore). Some side quests are general purpose, adding small amounts of intel for all three, some side quests are for a specific lieutenant.

We’re putting all three of these lieutenants in southern Kyrat (in the game as it is, Yuma is in the north, so we’re moving her). The Kyrat International Airport is also down there, and at any point after the tutorial you can go there, steal a plane, and Just Leave(tm), fulfilling your goal to escape Kyrat alive but failing to honor the dying wish of either of your dead parents.

The revelation that your father killed your toddler sister and your mother killed him for it is being moved way up to the halfway point of the game, when you open up the bridge to northern Kyrat. The Lakshmana shrine is also going somewhere in this area (Pagan Min’s palace might get relocated here entirely, or maybe there’s a shrine near the bridge that the protagonist’s mother had some personal connection to, whatever). Pagan Min’s forces are running scared, the Golden Path are ascendant, and Amita and Sabal’s vicious sides really start to show.

In the game as it is, if you side with Sabal, he kills a bunch of people for vague sins against the gods to usher in his new oppressive theocracy, and if you side with Amita, she pressgangs a bunch of people into the Golden Path against their will, in both cases in an epilogue scene that is hinted at in a drug-induced hallucination/prophecy. Outside of this drug trip, there’s no strong indication that Amita and Sabal aren’t perfectly heroic freedom fighters (despite some differing values about the importance of Kyrati religion and whether or not drugs are cool). The game definitely isn’t devoid of hints that these two are budding dictators of their own, but it’s easy to reach the end of the game and feel like you chose the wrong leader, which obscures the game’s strongest point: The theme that you can’t wring a free and prosperous nation out of every war just by identifying the bad team and killing all of their doods. Sometimes there’s a side fighting for democracy, but sometimes there isn’t and in the latter case there is nothing you can do. You can’t impose liberty on people by force.

So in the revised version of the game, you go into northern Kyrat having already interred your mother’s ashes and knowing that your father is a child murderer, while Sabal and Amita are splitting off to fight one another and the Royal Army remnant still led by Pagan Min. You now have the option to Just Leave(tm) having fulfilled your mother’s dying wish, leaving your father’s unfulfilled, or you can fulfill your father’s dying wish by hoovering up more intel from both Amita and Sabal (further spotlighting just how evil both of them are in the process) to locate Pagan Min and kill him.

Key to the general vibe here is that you aren’t a major factor in the war. The Golden Path was already ascendant when you got here and continues to be throughout the first half of the game. Your connection to founder Mohan Ghale and handiness with a knife means you get assigned to kill some of Pagan Min’s lieutenants, and you can sack Royal Army outposts as a side quest, but the Royal Army can recapture sacked outposts and the Golden Path regularly captures enemy outposts without your involvement. Outposts stay captured long enough that you don’t get the Far Cry 2 problem where they respawn after thirty fucking seconds, but you are not repainting the map by attacking outposts, you are just shoving the front line around in a way that doesn’t leave a permanent mark.

Particularly in northern Kyrat, it’s now a three-way war in which (assuming you don’t Just Leave(tm)) you have to help both Amita and Sabal against each other for the intel on Pagan Min’s final hideout to track him down and kill him. You’ve got some targets to hit and a shrine to locate and if you’re following the objectives the interface nudges you towards, you can’t have any long term loyalties.

Once Pagan Min is dead, you have another chance to Just Leave(tm), or you can stay behind, pick a side between Amita and Sabal, and see the war through. You can also give up on finding and killing Pagan Min to side with one or the other of them by completing all of their missions in northern Kyrat and none of the other’s, and then choosing to give up on killing Pagan Min to side with one of them. This is a bad idea. Amita is a ruthless power-monger who doesn’t need the son of the founder of the Golden Path hanging around as a threat to her legitimacy, especially not one who’s a capable enough warrior to have won the respect of the troops (you might not be winning the war single-handedly, but you’re still a very deadly fighter). Sabal is a murderous traditionalist who thinks you’ve been corrupted by having been raised in the West and are on the list of people to be killed to purge Kyrat of its sins. If you help one of them win, the map is covered by their faction, they’re all hostile, and now you need to get to the airport anyway to flee the country. It doesn’t really count as Just Leaving(tm) anymore because you got chased out of the country rather than deciding you’d done what you came to do and departing.

The level of personal involvement of your family in the Golden Path is probably still too much to carry the theme properly, so this might be better off if, like in Far Cry 2, you’re a mercenary who’s being paid to kill Pagan Min/his lieutenants, or if you have some personal grievance with Pagan Min and are coming to Kyrat for revenge. A total revamp of the plot, without making use of much of the pieces of the existing game, would dramatically expand the length of this project and no one is particularly salivating to see the result, but doing this properly would probably require a major overhaul to the protagonist. Ultimately, “returning to your roots” is more of a vacation-y tourist-y kind of arc, more suitable to the Murder Vacation version of Far Cry 4 than the Murder Can’t Help version I’m laying out here.

Usually, in Far Cry games, you are fighting some kind of enemy militia. Far Cry 4 and, if I understand correctly, Far Cry 6 are the exceptions so far, where you fight an actual national military. And at least in Far Cry 4, it’s a disappointingly small difference as compared to the militias and pirates of earlier games. Now, sure, these are the national militaries of tinpot dictatorships, presumably not even regional powers, let alone superpowers with a bottomless backlog of tanks and jets on the bleeding edge of military engineering. You wouldn’t expect them to necessarily have much in the way of nightvision, it’s not super out of place that they communicate mainly via radio signals you can intercept, and it’s fine that the standard issue assault rifle is the AK-47 rather than the AK-74 or tacticool rifles from recent years like 2009’s FN SCAR (the efficacy of things like the FN SCAR over older weapons is debatable – after decades of paying arms manufacturers for new assault rifle designs, the US army has decided to use the M16 forever – but certainly the only armies still using AK-47s are armies who can’t afford AK-74s).

But you would still expect these tinpot dictatorships to have tanks at all. Not to mention IFVs, which are just perfect for video game bad guys. An IFV is essentially a light tank which also carries a squad of infantry into battle, so it’s something you can slap onto your existing infantry squads to upgrade them into a miniboss. And yet, they don’t appear in Far Cry 4. It’s not like Far Cry 4 doesn’t already have vehicles with turrets, so it doesn’t seem like it’s a technology problem.

Tanks have the problem that it’s very difficult even for a supernaturally durable lone attacker to take them out, as modern tanks are basically immune to frontal attacks from most shoulder-mounted anti-tank rockets. There’s plenty of solutions, though. First of all, it’s a Far Cry game, so you can decide to ignore realism and let an RPG-7 blast straight through the front armor of a T-72 for no better reason except that it’s cool. Secondly, when you picture an RPG in your head, you are picturing an RPG-7, and that is a 1959 weapon ineffective against modern tanks. But it’s not like the whole world gave up on anti-tank weapons and just kept using RPG-7 forever. Far Cry 4 has a secret unlockable weapon which, the Wiki tells me, is some Biblical reference because the arms dealer who gives it to you is a Christian zealot, but it looks like an RPG-29, which punched through the front armor of a perfectly modern Challenger 2 in Iraq. But also, third, you could always have tanks be nearly impossible to destroy from the front and have fights against them focus on hitting their weaker top and rear armor.

Instead, Far Cry 4 gives us exactly one new enemy type (not counting wild animals), the hunter. The hunter is a very good addition to the game, a stealthy enemy who doesn’t show up on radar and if you tag them (which normally allows you to see enemies through walls) they only stay tagged for maybe five seconds before becoming untagged, plus they can take control of nearby animals, which are normally hostile to both sides. Hunters plug up a lot of Far Cry 3 enemies’ most consistently exploitable weaknesses (luring in or releasing an animal is way OP, tagging all enemies so you can see them all through walls makes stealth pretty easy and makes you almost impossible to flank), and if Far Cry 4 were about fighting warlord militias or pirates or religious terrorists, that would’ve been fine. But Pagan Min’s army is supposed to be an army, and the absence of any armored vehicles is a disappointment.

Far Cry 4 has an arena that you reach about a third of the way through the game. It’s thorough but standard arena gameplay: You fight in a small enclosed space against a bunch of enemies who are split up into different teams, some wild animals get mixed in, you have to be the last one standing, you start with a pre-defined weapon but can loot more from defeated enemies. You start out at rank 1 and each rank has a different arena battle associated with it, including your starting weapon. My first issue is that your starting weapon doesn’t have a clear trajectory. You start with a revolver, then get a glock that seems to mostly be a lateral move, and then you get a machine pistol which sounds better but is actually much worse because individual bullets deal way less damage and it’s way harder to line up headshots. I wonder if you’re supposed to get worse and worse starting weapons as you rank up, to increase the challenge? But if that were the case you’d think they’d start you with an AK-47 to make the downward progression more obvious.

But that’s mostly a nitpick, regardless of the details you start with a weapon that sucks and have to make do with that until you’re able to loot something better. No, the way Far Cry 4’s arena goes out of its way to suck is that instead of having you complete each rank’s battle once, you instead have to fill in a progression bar. But there’s next to no variation in the arena battles at any given rank whatsoever, so the higher ranks don’t have you fighting three or four randomly selected arena battles until you rank up. You fight the exact same arena battle three or four times until you rank up. There’s some connection to one of Ubisoft’s tie-in apps that they tried to push in the mid-2010s, and it looks like the app still exists, but Far Cry 4’s multiplayer doesn’t exist anymore so whatever impact the arena app had on the experience is gone now, and was ill-conceived to begin with.

If you want to do a tie-in app you have to go whole-hog with it, connect the two games to each other at such a fundamental level that they are two different modes of the same game, like, maybe the mobile app is a realtime game of managing a business or country or whatever and the PC/console game allowing you to rampage through the map to cause and/or solve problems for the mobile users. If you balance it right, it could probably be fun, and if it’s a major premise of your game, the people who play that game will be the people who want that. Admittedly, that would be a weird as Hell entry into the Far Cry series so probably don’t call it that.

But regardless, Far Cry 4’s tie-in app, like the tie-in app for Assassin’s Creed Unity, is an afterthought that the core game is better off without and which is almost certainly no fun to play on its own.

God, I’ve gotten a lot of posts out of Far Cry 3. I didn’t even play it for that long. I played it on PS3 due to technical difficulties on PC, so I don’t have Steam keeping track of my playtime, but it might’ve been as little as 15 hours (the console controls meant I wasn’t eager to take on many side quests).

Today’s post is about Far Cry 3’s ending. It’s really badly rushed. The entire southern island has exactly one character in it, an infiltrator of the evil mercenary company backing up the evil pirates you fought on the north island. He’s a reasonably fun character, but he doesn’t really have an arc. He just helps you infiltrate the mercenary company alongside him, set up an assassination of the big bad Hoyt, and then Hoyt plays an Uno reverse card and kills him instead. Which is then followed by Hoyt’s two bodyguards inexplicably vanishing so you can have a quick time event knife fight with him, and after that you’re dumped into a room filled with not only a dead Hoyt, but several dead guards. It’s clear that there was supposed to be more to getting you from the point when Sam (the south island’s one character) is killed to the point when you knife fight Hoyt, and they just didn’t have time and money for it, so they clumsily stitched it together with the next complete section of the game, where you rescue your little brother from being taken off the island to some unknown destination.

And the final final mission is so rushed it basically doesn’t exist. Throughout the first half of the game you’ve been saving your friends from Vaas’ pirates one by one. Riley, your little brother, was allegedly killed, so as far as you know all survivors are safe on the north island and ready to flee in a boat they’ve been repairing while you do all the protagonist-y murdering. But Jason Brody, the protagonist, decides to stay (in a cut scene, so it’s not really “you” doing it the way it’s you, the player, doing the murdering) in order to join the Rakyat warriors he’s been fighting alongside and take out Hoyt’s operation on the south island. It’s not framed like Jason just wants to finish the job, either, he’s leaving his old life in America behind to become a Rakyat.

Side note: There’s shades of mighty whitey in all this, where Jason Brody, American upper middle class failson, finds his calling, and that is to be a better Rakyat warrior than any of the natives of Rook Island who grew up in the culture. In fairness to Far Cry 3, though, I don’t really get the impression that the Rakyat are really an indigenous institution. They’ve clearly got connections to the native culture (the name “Rakyat” sure isn’t English), but they also seem like a weird and creepy cult, they’re obsessed with defeating Vaas and Hoyt, and you’re not even the only foreigner to become a prominent Rakyat – your first Rakyat ally Dennis seems to be the most prominent warrior before Jason shows up, and he’s from Liberia. It’s possible that the Rakyat are supposed to be a genuinely indigenous culture of vaguely menacing brown people, but it’s also possible that they’re supposed to be a terrorist cult formed in the wake of trauma inflicted by Hoyt’s mercenaries, one whose historical roots are, as is the case with most nationalist movements, one part aesthetic and two parts delusional.

On the one hand, “native culture who gets taken over by reactionary cult of personality in response to colonialist violence” seems like way too much nuance and depth for Ubisoft writing. On the other hand, nothing in the game oversimplifies to the point where that’s not a plausible interpretation, so the Rakyat actually are a very nuanced and interesting faction, even if I suspect that it happened by blind luck rather than deliberate story decisions.

But regardless, that’s the setup of the game going into the final mission: You make friends with the Rakyat while saving your friends on the north island, you decide to remain with the Rakyat and let your friends leave without you to head to the south island, and while on the south island you learn that your little brother Riley is actually alive and resolve to save him, much to the dismay of Citra, the Rakyat’s high priestess spiritual leader lady.

Continue reading “Far Cry 3 Had A Rushed Ending” →

Bookkeeping note that probably no one but me cares about, but which I find kinda funny: After nearly running out of backlog a bit ago, I switched to weekly posts for a bit, and while rebuilding the backlog, I’d sprinkle in new posts as they came until I had a 2/week schedule, then back up to 3/week. This meant that the posts relevant to the game I was discussing at the nadir – Far Cry 3 – wound up scattered all over the place. We were nearly through that era, but then the April Humble Choice dropped and I’d forgotten to leave room for it in the schedule, so rather than shifting every blog post by a couple of days, I just picked up the next post in the queue and dropped at the end, then put this post in the free spot. This post is timely (I don’t have much of an audience, but at least in theory people might read this post before deciding whether they want to sign up for the Humble Choice this month) and Far Cry 3 thoughts are very much not, so this makes sense, but it does mean that Far Cry 3 posts are spread out across like three months now.

Anyways, the April Humble Choice dropped on the 4th. What’s in the box?

The Death Stranding Director’s Cut is something I’m very 50/50 on. Hideo Kojima is a mad genius and Death Stranding is the point where he’s completely off the leash. Sometimes the results of this sort of thing are glorious and sometimes it results in the creator disappearing up the ass of their own very niche interests and creating a game that nobody but them is interested in. Death Stranding’s reviews make it clear that it’s not maximum trainwreck but equally so that it’s not maximum genius. I’ll definitely throw it in the backlog and see the results myself.

Aliens Fireteam Elite is a space marines vs. xenomorphs game. These games always struck me as deeply misguided. Xenomorphs are horror monsters, and while Aliens puts the emphasis on a swarm whose individual members are fairly expendable rather than a single killer creature, it was still about a team of cocky protagonists slowly coming to realize how much danger they’re in and breaking down as they’re picked off one by one, until only a small handful of survivors make it out in the end. And being a singular creature type with a striking design facilitates this horror really well and high-octane shooty action really poorly. If the protagonists are wading through the xenomorphs rather than the other way around, then you need really divergent enemy types amongst the xenomorphs to keep it interesting. While I could imagine someone doing that, there’s no sign that this game has done so, and I’m not going to sink 8-10 hours into it to double check.

I’m playing the Borderlands series right now, and so far as games about shooting cool looking alien monsters with a variety of firearms goes, I can’t imagine anything based on the Alien franchise will ever compete. Having a single really cool monster design seems like it would give Alien a headstart over Borderlands’ knock-off creatures, but if the premise of your game is simple visceral fun, then Borderlands’ simple visceral designs work better than something like the xenomorph, despite the xenomorph’s vastly superior cultural cache and artistic merit, because Borderlands’ monsters are purpose-built to be blown up with rockets and the xenomorph is very much not.

If you want to make a game that captures the feeling of Aliens, it needs to be about taking a squad of space marines in or near a xenomorph hive to complete some mission, with the expectation that completing one out of three objectives in exchange for losing half your squad is a pretty typical result, one that emphasizes variety in your team over variety in the enemies (although you don’t have to go with a perfectly lore accurate version with only three different enemies – facehuggers, standard xenomorphs, and the queen – but you do have to have a setup where the standard xenomorphs remain a significant threat from one end of the campaign to the other).

Rollerdrome is my new gold standard for indie games on a limited budget. It sells itself on the weird mechanical concept of being a shooter where you’re on rollerskates and do mid-air tricks to get more ammo. That’s a weird and cool concept and I would like to check it out, but I don’t want to spend more than a few hours on it. How Long To Beat clocks its completion time in at 5 hours, so this is something I can fit into a single lazy afternoon. It doesn’t seem to have much more to offer besides that weird and cool concept of a roller blade shooter, but it’s short enough to plausibly not wear out the welcome of that idea.

Life is Strange 2 is the sequel to the award-winning game where you walk around as a hipster. This one stars a different hipster, I guess. I’m not down on the walking simulator genre in general, I think there are some valid experiences to be had where the only significant mechanic is walking around a place. Return of the Obra Dinn, most notably, is a walking simulator attached to a bit of paperwork, and while the paperwork does add some kind of pass/fail metric, it is not the primary mechanic. The primary mechanic is walking around observing things. Obra Dinn is sufficiently opaque that some kind of checklist of things to figure out is needed to pull a player in deep enough to understand just how much there is to explore here, but you can imagine a game (or some kind of interactive experience, anyway) that drops you into a crime scene that’s sufficiently straightforward at least in what the crime was, and then leaves you to piece out what happened without any mechanic for checking if you were correct. It’d be a very internet-era thing where the fun would be in the conversation happening around the game, either within small circles of friends playing the game together or a broader sub-culture if the game manages to become the flavor of the week, but we are in the internet era so that could work.

The Hipster Walking Simulator series, however, uses its mechanics to deliver a linear plot with the illusion of choice (the first game had exactly one real choice at the end). It feels like another one of those things like Gris that should’ve just been a film but Kickstarters for films don’t do as well as Kickstarters for video games so they slapped on some dialogue choices that alter nothing.

The Life and Suffering of Sir Brante is a narrative-focused game where you are a sad knight. It has a text and illustrations format that looks interesting and beautiful, but, I mean, it’s about being a sad dude in a medieval dystopia. “What if you had to struggle against unfair odds to make something of your life” is not some weird experience I need to play a video game to experience, and while there’s a lot to be said for a relatable story, it’s really not clear what else there is besides this game being about a guy who must struggle against unfair odds to make something of his life.

I’m going to pick up Monster Prom 2: Monster Camp because I like the writing of this series so hey, why not, but I’m not putting it in the backlog. I said earlier that Rollerdrome is my gold standard for an indie game not stretching its content thin, but the Monster Prom series is also good for this (although the quality is in a steady decline from the original, as it struggles harder and harder to make its thin mechanics apply to new situations, and they don’t seem to have any proper game designers on staff to write new ones). In fact, Monster Prom is really good at simultaneously having an extremely low time to complete (about 45 minutes) but an extremely high time to 100%, which means it can plausibly be the one video game bought in a month for someone with more time than money and who really likes Monster Prom without holding closure on its story hostage to 20+ hours of gameplay for people who like it enough to engage with as a distraction but not as the main game played for a full fortnight.

Revita, meanwhile, continues the blight of indie games that stretch themselves thin with Roguelite gameplay. Neat pixel aesthetic, gameplay that looks unexceptional but fun, aaaaaand a 10 hour completion rate for just the main story on How Long To Beat with nearly 30 hours for main story + side content (and five hundred hours for 100%, although given how round the number is, I’m guessing that’s one guy submitting what may or may not be a wild guess – HLTB doesn’t make any effort to check that people reporting completion times have actually acquired relevant achievements, and while liars get washed out by numbers in popular games, Revita’s not that popular).

I have mixed feelings about passing on Founders’ Fortune. The premise of a cute little village-building game where each villager has a randomly generated personality and develops relationships with other villagers sounds like fun, and I’m mainly passing up on it because I’m worried this will end up like Little Big Workshop where it’s very frustrating in play because it’s poorly balanced or has UI issues or in some other way lacks polish. These kinds of city builder games have a steep demand for effective polish which means indie games can fuck them up easily, which can result in a game that I play for 20+ hours but ultimately walk away from unsatisfied because it was slowly smothered by its technical limitations as my little workshop/village/whatever scaled upwards past the limits of what the game could handle while still only reaching half of what the game’s objectives tell me should be possible. I’m worried enough that Founders’ Fortune might do this that I’m passing on it even though I have no particular evidence that it actually will.

That’s two new games in the backlog bringing me to 168 total, meaning I am finally below 170 games even after a monthly restock from the Humble Choice (although partly I got here from moving the Forest to Regrets after realizing that, for all that I really want to play the game that the Forest promised, I’ve already played enough of it, and read enough of their wiki, to know that they didn’t make that game, and also Die Young when I realized that the game they were promising sounded a like what the Forest actually delivered, which I evidently don’t like enough to sink more than 5 hours into). I’ve been hovering at around 170 games in the backlog for a long time, with dire implications for what games I might never get around to, but it is starting to look like that was mainly a consequence of 1) working out the kinks in how selective I should be with what games go into the backlog and 2) the OGL crisis devouring all of my free time in January and February of this year, to the point where I had zero game completions in all of January.